Sign In »
Register Now!
Help
A plethora of trip wires about calf height would slow them quite a bit.
Caltrops on the other hand would be useless.
Different tactics for different zombies?!
Rate Topic:
#41
Posted 20 May 2009 - 05:55 AM
- Undead Vice Admiral
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,961
- Joined: 05-September 08
ADVERSUS VICTUS MORTUUS TANTUM CAPUT MISSA PENDO
Back to top
#42
Posted 20 May 2009 - 09:53 AM
- Zombie Commander
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 563
- Joined: 02-December 08
- LocationSan Clemente, CA
Fast zombies would suck. Theo only thing I could see as being cool about that is watching people be tackled by zombies.:lol:
"Our houses are protected by the good lord and a gun, you might meet 'em both if you show up here not welcome son"
#43
Posted 20 May 2009 - 10:22 AM
- Still Breathing
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 30-April 09
:scare:until they tackle you... and the best thing for fast zombies would be like a m16 ak47 ak74u mp5 uzi any thing with a full auto capacity because if they are like the ones in left 4 dead or 28 weeks they can be killed by head shots or any other body shot if you shoot them once or twice but lets just hope they dont evolve like in left 4 dead O.o that would be scary i would most likely die from one blow from a tank
yup i drew that no tracing included all hand drawn ;) its the rookie from halo odst
#44
Former Member: Necrolegion
Posted 20 May 2009 - 05:07 PM
Quote
In my fantasy world they are shamblers end of story.
YOU can have the fast moving thinking ones if you like but I will just say "no thanks".
YOU can have the fast moving thinking ones if you like but I will just say "no thanks".
haha, mine too buddy. i would rather have slow moving corpses, but i was just saying fro practicality "What if?"
#45
Former Member: Necrolegion
Posted 20 May 2009 - 05:10 PM
left for dead zombies would easily dispatch most of us me thinks lol. i am assuming that most people wouldn't expect to be puked on or tackled from like, fifty feet away
#46
Posted 21 May 2009 - 10:46 AM
- Still Breathing
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 30-April 09
:lol:or get a wet slimy tung constricting you or a big buff guy on steroids O.o that wont freaking die!!! hahahaah :x but yea the zombies are easy to kill
yup i drew that no tracing included all hand drawn ;) its the rookie from halo odst
#47
Posted 21 May 2009 - 03:51 PM
- Undead Brigadier General
-
- Group: Banned
- Posts: 1,064
- Joined: 16-October 08
- Locationabandoned victorian mansion on the hill
i hate the witches the most
i got a cure for ugly .... cat got ur tounge no but my chainsaw sure does
kiltedninja Posted 04 November 2010 - 03:57 PM
Well, some of us are a whole lot older than that. I think Bob might have actually fought in the civil war
You know how I am with tools. No pain was inflicted intentionally.
Bella Swan, Eclipse, Chapter 2,
What is a valid reason for someone to love someone else? Since apparently I’m doing it wrong.
Bella Swan, Eclipse, Chapter 4
kiltedninja Posted 04 November 2010 - 03:57 PM
Well, some of us are a whole lot older than that. I think Bob might have actually fought in the civil war
You know how I am with tools. No pain was inflicted intentionally.
Bella Swan, Eclipse, Chapter 2,
What is a valid reason for someone to love someone else? Since apparently I’m doing it wrong.
Bella Swan, Eclipse, Chapter 4
#48
Former Member: Necrolegion
Posted 21 May 2009 - 05:22 PM
yeah. but the real question is, if we banded together, would we be able to survive those kind of "Evolved" type zombies?
#49
Posted 21 May 2009 - 05:36 PM
- Zombie Ensign
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 229
- Joined: 24-July 07
I can think of a worse zombie: A supernatural fast zombie that can only be stopped by physical destuction, meaning burning it, blowing it to bits or doing enough damage to its body by gunfire/cutting until it can't move.
Hell, they wouldn't even have to be fast zombies. Imagine shamblers that you need to unload a 20 round 5.56 clip or hack to pieces to stop.
Hell, they wouldn't even have to be fast zombies. Imagine shamblers that you need to unload a 20 round 5.56 clip or hack to pieces to stop.
"Imagine"? "nothing to kill or die for"? Having nothing worth dying for, or killing for, is having nothing worth living for.
#50
Former Member: Necrolegion
Posted 21 May 2009 - 05:42 PM
so i am assuming that they would be spreading their un-dead-ness the same way as other zombies right? if they were not fast, i wouldn't think it would be that much harder than taking down your average shambler.
although, if they WERE fast, then i believe that difference would be monumental.
lastly on that point, your saying they would not decay, and would out last time?
although, if they WERE fast, then i believe that difference would be monumental.
lastly on that point, your saying they would not decay, and would out last time?
#51
Posted 21 May 2009 - 05:56 PM
- Zombie Ensign
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 229
- Joined: 24-July 07
Yes and no. It wouldn't be a "disease" with 100% lethality rate, more like classic Romero where if you die regardless of cause, you come back. This means you could survive a bite, provided you treated the wound properly REALLY FAST, but you would still get sepsis pretty quick and go into shock if you don't.
I think it would be WAY harder than shamblers, and only somewhat less difficult than fast undead because a group of say, 15 might very well soak a ruck full of ammo before going down. Not only that, it'd take you more time to dispatch each zombie, that means by the time you might be done with the first 3, the others might be right on top of you.
EDit: Very slow natural decay, like, decades.
I think it would be WAY harder than shamblers, and only somewhat less difficult than fast undead because a group of say, 15 might very well soak a ruck full of ammo before going down. Not only that, it'd take you more time to dispatch each zombie, that means by the time you might be done with the first 3, the others might be right on top of you.
EDit: Very slow natural decay, like, decades.
This post has been edited by Faran Brigo: 21 May 2009 - 06:00 PM
"Imagine"? "nothing to kill or die for"? Having nothing worth dying for, or killing for, is having nothing worth living for.
#52
Former Member: Necrolegion
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:03 PM
well, easily accessible items, like booze, rags, lighters, styrofoam, orange juice pulp.... stuff like that, and you have an explosive or a lasting flame. you did mention burning right? throw some of those and drive off. at least the way i am thinking, that would work alright. but i would really not like to have that Romero style of reanimation.... that would be pretty rough
#53
Posted 22 May 2009 - 07:53 PM
- Zombie Ensign
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 229
- Joined: 24-July 07
If there's something worse than zombies coming at you, it would be zombies coming at you while on FIRE. As for driving off, well, that really works in any situation except if you don't have access to a car, the streets are impassable or you're sorrounded.
"Imagine"? "nothing to kill or die for"? Having nothing worth dying for, or killing for, is having nothing worth living for.
#54
Former Member: Necrolegion
Posted 22 May 2009 - 10:31 PM
haha, that is true. i can just picture that though... really funny.
cough cough.
anyways, your right. climbing buildings, gaining vantage points and whatnot would also be useless regarding the molotovs. i must say though, once you have the higher level advantage, weapons that go smashy smashy would work to keep them off or away for a while, and if they are that invulnerable to attacks, how many blows would it take from one of those type weapons when your sitting perched upon your mound of piled up wreckage?
cough cough.
anyways, your right. climbing buildings, gaining vantage points and whatnot would also be useless regarding the molotovs. i must say though, once you have the higher level advantage, weapons that go smashy smashy would work to keep them off or away for a while, and if they are that invulnerable to attacks, how many blows would it take from one of those type weapons when your sitting perched upon your mound of piled up wreckage?
#55
Posted 22 May 2009 - 11:59 PM
- Undead Brigadier General
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,160
- Joined: 25-May 06
Once again, I think a Saiga with 00 buckshot would be pretty good. It might take several hits per zombie, based on luck, but eventually you're going to put so many holes in so many bones and muscles that the mechanical structure of the zombie's body will fail.
http://www.myspace.com/archelaus_mason
"I may not have the right to do it, but you don't have the power to stop me."
"I may not have the right to do it, but you don't have the power to stop me."
#56
Posted 23 May 2009 - 02:27 AM
- Fresh Corpse
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 04-February 09
A Saiga with solids would probably do alright aswell.:evil:
PRIDE FC
#57
Posted 23 May 2009 - 02:54 AM
- Zombie Ensign
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 229
- Joined: 24-July 07
mattifikation said:
Once again, I think a Saiga with 00 buckshot would be pretty good. It might take several hits per zombie, based on luck, but eventually you're going to put so many holes in so many bones and muscles that the mechanical structure of the zombie's body will fail.
Yes that's exactly the idea, cause enough damage to bring them down through motor failure, or just take off the arms and head (I don't think a bloody torso with legs is going to be dangerous or, you know, able to navigate).
And that's what I was saying, this would be a very dangerous type of zombie because you'd need heavy weapons and/or a lot of ammunition to kill them. Against these zombies things like sledgehammers or axes would really shine I suppose but even then, bashing and hacking away at it is going to take a lot of effort. I think these would be almost the polar opposite of the newer "fast zombies" that are all the rage now.
"Imagine"? "nothing to kill or die for"? Having nothing worth dying for, or killing for, is having nothing worth living for.
#58
Posted 24 May 2009 - 03:11 PM
- Zombie Commander
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 563
- Joined: 02-December 08
- LocationSan Clemente, CA
I'm in the process of planning my zombie story, and I've combined several ideas for how the virus and zombies work. I can tell you about it if you PM me and promise not to rip my idea off.
Anyway, I think that those kind of zombies would be terrible, I think I'd have to learn to fly.
Anyway, I think that those kind of zombies would be terrible, I think I'd have to learn to fly.
"Our houses are protected by the good lord and a gun, you might meet 'em both if you show up here not welcome son"
#59
Posted 24 May 2009 - 03:48 PM
- Undead Brigadier General
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,160
- Joined: 25-May 06
I think it would be *great* to do a supernatural-style zombie like the ones we're talking about now. Fast, intelligent enough to at least turn doorknobs and use simple tools, and completely immune to death.
http://www.myspace.com/archelaus_mason
"I may not have the right to do it, but you don't have the power to stop me."
"I may not have the right to do it, but you don't have the power to stop me."
#60
Former Member: Necrolegion
Posted 24 May 2009 - 05:52 PM
Quote
I think it would be *great* to do a supernatural-style zombie like the ones we're talking about now. Fast, intelligent enough to at least turn doorknobs and use simple tools, and completely immune to death.
yeah, if you were to try and take on a handful of those suckers and come out alive, you would reach hero status. i don't care who you are or how you do it, if you can take on ten of those yourself, your a legend
