PDA

View Full Version : Four zombie flicks I rented, what can I expect?


MaxVeers
07-19-2007, 10:39 PM
I dug through the videos at the new rental place in our town, found a few I had heard of but hadn't seen. I read the info on IMDB and some threads here, but I figured I'd ask you guys for your opinions... Basically, I'm bored at work, and I'll be watching them at work tomorrow, so...

What can I expect? Here's what I got:

Gangs of the Dead
Hood of the Living Dead
Bone Sickness
Night of the Dead (not to be confused with NOTLD)

And, as a standby incase all of the above suck so much I can't tolerate them, Idle Hands.

Other than the last one (and I know what to expect there, and that's Jessica Alba's sweet, sweet ass), what do you guys think?

evilzombie20
07-19-2007, 11:50 PM
GANGS OF THE DEAD - Pretty decent little zombie flick. Nothing spectacular but a good way to kill 90 minutes.

HOOD OF THE LIVING DEAD - CRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPP!!!!

BONE SICKNESS - Gore-tastic fun!!!!

NIGHT OF THE DEAD - Well, this one depends. How did you feel about RE-ANIMATOR??? It's kinda a rip off of that but...more zombies and well...not as well acted. Okay this one's pretty bad too but two outta 4 ain't bad.

BarnabusBlackoak
07-20-2007, 11:04 AM
all four are pretty lame. bone sickness makes no sense, night of the dead is horribly acted. hope you got them cheap.

stegon66
07-20-2007, 01:52 PM
I thought Gangs of the Dead and Hood of the Living Dead were decent as far as these things go.

Gave 'em both *** out of ****

Bone Sickness is awful but does deliver the gore in spades. *1/2 out of ****

Night of the Dead plays out like a poor man's Re-Animator. Worth a look. **1/2 out of ****

taifOOm
07-26-2007, 01:05 PM
Gangs of the Dead was the worst of the bunch IMO, but they're all crap.